Potential for disaster
Potential for disaster and the death of the net as a free medium
REPORT FROM THE BBC
Social network sites face US ban
Many schools have already banned social network sites
Children in the US could be banned from using social networking sites in schools and libraries by a new law.
The Deleting Online Predators Act tries to limit the access paedophiles have to the networking sites which have become hugely popular with minors.
The act has already been approved by a large majority in the House of Representatives.
Critics say the act is too broad and could mean a huge number of websites are cut off from users.
Net ban
The DOPA Act was introduced into the US legislative system by Congressman Michael Fitzpatrick. It passed 410 votes to 15 in a vote on 26 July.
Speaking before the vote was taken, he said: "The social networking sites have become, in a sense, a happy hunting ground for child predators."
The act covers federal institutions that received funding for computers and net access via the US E-Rate scheme - primarily schools and libraries. The American Library Association (ALA) estimates that two-thirds of US libraries receive this funding.
It requires these organisations to put in place filters to stop children viewing social networking sites where they might be subject to "unlawful sexual advances".
Critics fear many popular sites could be caught by the law
Children will only be allowed to use the social networking sites if adults are present.
Social networking sites such as MySpace, Bebo, Facebook, Friendster and many others count large numbers of children among their users.
In both the UK and US many schools have already banned pupils from using these networks over fears that the children are taking risks with the amount of information they are posting.
The DOPA Act leaves the final definition of what counts as a social networking site to the Federal Communications Commission.
Critics say the act's broad description of what the FCC should take into account in its definition could mean a huge number of sites will be blocked by libraries.
The act says the FCC should consider any site that allows users to create and modify a profile, chat to other users and post personal information.
Those criticising the Act said this could mean that a huge number of websites, such as Slashdot, Amazon, blogging sites, wikis and news organisations could be cut off.
"DOPA is redundant and unnecessary legislation," said Leslie Burger, president of the ALA in a statement. She pointed out that the Children's Internet Protection Act already requires libraries to block net content that is harmful to children.
Some MySpace users have created an online petition to gather support for protests about the act. The petition, called Save your Space, aims to gather more than one million signatures in a month.
The act now passes to the Senate and a vote on its approval is likely to take place in early August.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
This raises questions as to who is controlling the internet and if the goverment is able to put in place a law that prevents teenagers from accessing certain sites, does that serve the same purpose as to stop freedom of speech and freedom of movement. Can it be thought of in those terms? Ultimately is the goverment protecting the children and teenagers or being over cautious on the consumption of media by our younger generation.
REPORT FROM THE BBC
Social network sites face US ban
Many schools have already banned social network sites
Children in the US could be banned from using social networking sites in schools and libraries by a new law.
The Deleting Online Predators Act tries to limit the access paedophiles have to the networking sites which have become hugely popular with minors.
The act has already been approved by a large majority in the House of Representatives.
Critics say the act is too broad and could mean a huge number of websites are cut off from users.
Net ban
The DOPA Act was introduced into the US legislative system by Congressman Michael Fitzpatrick. It passed 410 votes to 15 in a vote on 26 July.
Speaking before the vote was taken, he said: "The social networking sites have become, in a sense, a happy hunting ground for child predators."
The act covers federal institutions that received funding for computers and net access via the US E-Rate scheme - primarily schools and libraries. The American Library Association (ALA) estimates that two-thirds of US libraries receive this funding.
It requires these organisations to put in place filters to stop children viewing social networking sites where they might be subject to "unlawful sexual advances".
Critics fear many popular sites could be caught by the law
Children will only be allowed to use the social networking sites if adults are present.
Social networking sites such as MySpace, Bebo, Facebook, Friendster and many others count large numbers of children among their users.
In both the UK and US many schools have already banned pupils from using these networks over fears that the children are taking risks with the amount of information they are posting.
The DOPA Act leaves the final definition of what counts as a social networking site to the Federal Communications Commission.
Critics say the act's broad description of what the FCC should take into account in its definition could mean a huge number of sites will be blocked by libraries.
The act says the FCC should consider any site that allows users to create and modify a profile, chat to other users and post personal information.
Those criticising the Act said this could mean that a huge number of websites, such as Slashdot, Amazon, blogging sites, wikis and news organisations could be cut off.
"DOPA is redundant and unnecessary legislation," said Leslie Burger, president of the ALA in a statement. She pointed out that the Children's Internet Protection Act already requires libraries to block net content that is harmful to children.
Some MySpace users have created an online petition to gather support for protests about the act. The petition, called Save your Space, aims to gather more than one million signatures in a month.
The act now passes to the Senate and a vote on its approval is likely to take place in early August.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
This raises questions as to who is controlling the internet and if the goverment is able to put in place a law that prevents teenagers from accessing certain sites, does that serve the same purpose as to stop freedom of speech and freedom of movement. Can it be thought of in those terms? Ultimately is the goverment protecting the children and teenagers or being over cautious on the consumption of media by our younger generation.
posted by displacedpixil at 10:01 pm
1 Comments:
yup sure....
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/technology/5230506.stm
I just seems strange how they're saying they're trying to protect the children from paedophiles, when in fact they're just creating another evasion problem as well just like alcohol..
Post a Comment
<< Home